Legal Opinion

Mandelbaum v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 30, 1925No. 6818PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Valkenburgh, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). It should be kept in mind at the outset that this ease involves no sporadic ease of stock-jobbing by a concern conceived and organized for that specific purpose without substantial business foundation. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company is one of perhaps four large corporations of similar character which have been developed in connection with the phenomenal growth of the automobile industry. At the time of-the transaction here involved it had been in business for 22 years, and was known throughout the United States and abroad as a business concern of great…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Sigafus v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co. v. City of LincolnSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Richardson v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  5. Nupen v. PearceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Corliss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  2. Gold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  3. Lovell v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Readinger v. RorickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API