Legal Opinion

Gold v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 6, 1929No. 8383-8386PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Circuit Judge.

By separate writs of error and by separate appeals William H. Gold and Guy Huston seek to reverse a judgment of conviction against them for making use of the United States mail in violation of section 215 of the Criminal Code (l&iUSCA § 338).

'“.ato-The' judgment against Gold was entered December 3,1927, the judgment against Huston on December 5, 1927. On January 28, 1928, petitions for writs of error, accompanied by assignments of error, were filed, by Gold and Huston respectively. On the same day orders were filed allowing the writs of error. Thereafter, on February…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Rudd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  3. Van Gorder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  4. Bishop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  5. Grantello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. George Beck v. The United States of America, David R. Tuthill v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  2. Pritchard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  3. Cravens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. Spalitto v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  5. United States v. Edward Earl HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API