Legal Opinion

Hudson v. PETROLEUM TRANSIT COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1959No. 452PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, C. J.

As stated in brief of plaintiff appellant the only question involved on this appeal -is whether or not the judge holding -the court committed error by granting the defendants’ motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the end of the plaintiff’s evidence.

In this connection this Court held in Williams v. Funeral Home, 248, N.C. 524, 103 S.E. 2d 714, in opinion by Rodman, J., that: “Where a 'Collision occurs at an intersection controlled by a traffic light within a municipality so that G.S. 20-158 (c) is inapplicable, andi the municipal ordinance is not introduced in evidence, the rights of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Hicks v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McNair v. BoyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Wrenn v. Hillcrest Convalescent Home, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Bryant v. WoodliefSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Shoe v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Davis v. JessupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API