Legal Opinion

Odom v. Langston

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 10, 1946No. 39690PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiffs, as heirs of Barsha A. Langston, deceased, on September 28, 1943, sued for a declaratory judgment to test the validity of a trust instrument executed by her. The trial court sustained separate motions of defendants to dismiss the petition on the ground that it “fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in plaintiffs, or to state a claim entitling plaintiffs to relief . . . ” Plaintiffs declined to plead further, judgment was rendered against them and they have appealed.

In November, 1935, Barsha. A. Langston executed the trust instrument transferring to named…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trautz v. LempSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. Bates v. BatesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  3. Odom v. LangstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. Sell v. WestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Odom v. LangstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Chilcutt v. ThatchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Atlantic National Bank v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  3. Odom v. LangstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  4. Nations v. RamseyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Stribling v. JolleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API