Legal Opinion

Odom v. Langston

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 10, 1946No. 39583PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GANTT. J.

Action to have the residuary clause of the will of Barsha A. Langston, deceased, ruled void for alleged legal infirmities. The amount involved exceeds $7500. On defendants’ motion, and under the facts alleged in the petition, which includes a copy of the will, the trial court dismissed the action as barred by the five year statute of limitations. [Sec. 1014, R.'S. Mo. 1939,] Plaintiffs appealed.

In substance the material facts alleged in the petition follow: The validity of the small specific bequests are admitted by the plaintiffs. The beneficiaries under said bequests were not made…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hamilton v. GuinotteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  2. Rubey v. BarnettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
  3. Byrne v. ByrneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. Buchanan v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Foster v. PetreeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  2. Odom v. LangstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  3. Odom v. LangstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  4. Odom v. LangstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  5. Applegate v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API