Legal Opinion

Trautz v. Lemp

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 6, 1932PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, J. —

The several appeals herein were consolidated and presented as one cause and will be decided in one opinion. These appeals involve the construction of the will of Alexander H. Handlan, deceased, and certain other questions, the determination of which hinges, in the main, upon the proper construction of the will.

The testator made certain specific bequests which are not in question here, then disposed of the residue of his estate by the fourteenth clause of his will which reads as follows:

“All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, of whatsoever kind and wherever situated,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Koehler v. RowlandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  2. Lewis v. CurnuttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Deacon v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  4. Tomlinson v. EllisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. Tindall v. TindallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Edgar v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  2. Gardner v. VanlandinghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. McDougal v. McDougalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Estate of Bernays v. MajorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API