Legal Opinion

Rundgren v. Bank of New York Mellon

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided February 28, 2011No. Civil 10-00252 JMS/LEKPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED ON NOVEMBER 5, 2010

J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff originally filed this action on March 10, 2010, alleging claims against various Defendants stemming from mortgage transactions and a subsequent notice of nonjudicial foreclosure concerning real property located at 4487 Emmalani Drive, Princeville, Hawaii 96722 (the “subject property”). After two rounds of motions practice, Plaintiff ultimately filed her Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), which alleges claims…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at PasadenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Schnidt v. HSC, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Heejoon Chung v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2017
  3. Amina v. WMC Fin. Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2018
  4. Menashe v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
  5. Ramos v. Chase Home FinanceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API