Legal Opinion
Sykes v. Hengel
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided April 27, 2004No. 4:03-CV-40526PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
GRITZNER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(7) (“Rule 12(b)(7)”) for failure to join a necessary and indispensable party under Fed.R.Civ.P. 19 (“Rule 19”). A hearing on the motion was held on February 23, 2004. Plaintiff was represented by Mark Sherinian; Defendants were represented by Wade Hauser.
I. FACTS
In August 2001, Plaintiff David Sykes signed a five-year written employment contract to act as President and Chief Executive Officer for Vision Improvement Technologies, LLC…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Temple v. Synthes Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Janney Montgomery Scott, Inc. v. Shepard Niles, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Delgado v. Plaza Las Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Shermoen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Washington v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fisherman's Harvest, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- American Insurance v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Cummins Power Generation Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Midland Farms, LLC v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2014
- Bohanna v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.