Legal Opinion
Shermoen v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 24, 1992No. 91-16045PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POOLE, Circuit Judge:
I
Seventy individual Native Americans and the Coast Indian Community of Yurok Indians of the Resighini Ranchería, appellants, seek review of the district court’s dismissal of their suit seeking injunctive relief and a declaration that the Hoopa-Yurok Settlement Act violates their constitutional rights. They also appeal the denial of their motion to amend their complaint. We affirm.
II
On October 31, 1988, Congress enacted the Hoopa-Yurok Settlement Act, Pub.L. No. 100-580, 102 Stat. 2924 (codified at 25 U.S.C. §§ 1300i — 1300i—11 (1988)) (“Act”), thereby partitioning a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Harold Dawavendewa, a Single Man v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, an Arizona Corporation, the Navajo NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Klamath Tribe Claims Committee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Wilbur v. LockeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Maria v. Altmann, an Individual v. Republic of Austria, a Foreign State and the Austrian Gallery, an Agency of the Republic of AustriaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. StateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.