Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Blum

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1926PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In 1917, the Bjerre brothers were farming on the Berthhold Reservation in McLean county. They borrowed $1,000 from the plaintiff Hanson. To secure this indebtedness they gave Hanson a mortgage on a threshing outfit. Hanson filed this mortgage as required by § 6758, Comp. Laws 1913, on December 5th, 1917. Thereafter, the Bjerre brothers also had business relations with the defendant Blum. They also contracted a large indebtedness with their banks, to secure which, they gave security on the same threshing outfit. Hanson's debt was not paid, but Hanson failed to renew his mortgage at the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bondurant v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Union National Bank v. OiumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Cardenas v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. McMahon v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Smith v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1914

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Citizens State Bank v. O'LearyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Security First National Bank v. SartoriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Lakota Mercantile Co. v. BalsleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Commercial Security Bank of Ogden v. Chimes PressUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Royal v. AubolNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API