Legal Opinion

Royal v. Aubol

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1939No. File No. 6596PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

This is an action in claim and delivery. It is alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff has a special interest in, is the owner of and is entitled to the immediate possession of certain described farming machinery by reason of chattel mortgage liens and bills of sale executed and delivered to the plaintiff by one Wilhelm Stark, now deceased. In their answer the defendants deny plaintiff’s right to the possession of the described property and assert their right to retain possession thereof under mortgages and a bill of sale also executed by Wilhelm Stark. In the district court, the case was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Linde v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Wood v. BryneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  3. National Bank of Commerce v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  4. Yeatman v. KingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  5. McCarty v. GoodsmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doeden v. StubstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Northern States Power Co. v. Board of Railroad CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Lenihan v. MeyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API