Legal Opinion
Lakota Mercantile Co. v. Balsley
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 19, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.
The Lakota Mercantile Company commenced this action against C. P. Balsley to foreclose two chattel mortgages given to it by Balsley and made the Goldammer-Oranna-Weaver -Company a co-defendant.
The Goldammer Corporation commenced an action against the same Balsley and another to determine title to property formerly belonging to Balsley which it had purchased on execution sale and made the Lakota Mercantile Company a codefendant, alleging that this Mercantile Company claimed to have a mortgage upon the property and asked the court to determine the validity of this mortgage. Each plaintiff…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Christianson v. Farmers' Warehouse Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Doyle v. DoyleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Union National Bank v. OiumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Petrie v. WymanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Hanson v. BlumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Minor v. Building and Construction Trades CouncilNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Cretors v. TroyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- Donovan v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- Stonehouse v. MersiovskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- Stude v. MittelstedtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.