Legal Opinion

Snell v. Engineered Systems & Designs, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 13, 1995No. 486, 1994PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

In this appeal from the Court of Chancery, we consider whether Section 2825 of the Delaware Professional Engineers’ Act, 24 Del.C., chapter 28 (the “Act”), may constitutionally prohibit Engineered Systems and Designs (“ESD”) from using the term “engineered” in its trade name. The Council of the Delaware Association of Professional Engineers (the “Council”) brought this action for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, claiming that Section 2825 bars ESD’s use of that term and that the statute is constitutional. ESD counterclaimed under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, alleging…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hazout v. Tsang Mun TingSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  2. Hoover v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  3. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  4. Kallop v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  5. Wien v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API