Legal Opinion
Hazout v. Tsang Mun Ting
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided February 26, 2016No. 353, 2015PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRINE, Chief Justice:
I. INTRODUCTION
The plain language of § 3114(b) of Title 10 states that a nonresident officer of a Delaware corporation, by virtue of accepting and holding office, has consented to the exercise of personal jurisdiction over him in the Delaware courts in two classes of eases: (i) “all civil actions or proceedings brought in this State, by or on behalf of, or against such corporation, in which such officer is a necessary or proper party”; or (ii) “any action or proceeding against such officer for violation of a duty in such capacity.” 1 This case involves a straightforward…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- DFC Global Corporation v. Muirfield Value Partners, L.P.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2017
- Fuld v. Palestine Liberation OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Hall v. Maritek Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 2017
- Onewoo Corp. v. Hampshire Brands, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Bridgeville Rifle & Pistol Club, Ltd. v. SmallSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.