Legal Opinion

Hoover v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 6, 2008No. 408, 2007PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

This matter is before the Court as the result of the Superior Court’s certification of two questions of law, pursuant to article IV, section 11(8) of the Delaware Constitution 1 and Delaware Supreme Court Rule 41. Recent decisions of the Superior Court interpreting section 4176A have con flicted on the statute’s constitutionality. 2 The defendants in those cases, Cordrey and Adkins, argued that section 4176A violates due process under the United States Constitution because its language is imper-missibly vague. 3

Following the conflicting decisions in Cordrey and Adkins, the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Davis v. Dennis B.California Supreme Court · 1976

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  2. Zhurbin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  3. Pardo v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
  4. Evans v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019
  5. State v. MurraySuperior Court of Delaware · 2017

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API