Legal Opinion

Fulton v. King Soopers

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1990No. 90CA0420PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*422Opinion by

Judge SMITH.

Kenneth R. Fulton, claimant, contests a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which held that, under Colo. Sess.Laws 1987, ch. 51, § 8-51-108(4) (repealed and reenacted as § 8-42-110(3), C.R.S. (1990 Cum.Supp.)), he is limited to an award of permanent medical impairment or scheduled disability award. We affirm.

Claimant works for King Soopers as a mechanic. In May 1988 he sustained an admitted industrial injury to his left hand. After recovering from the injury, he returned to work for King Soopers at his preinjury rate of pay. However, claimant’s…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boice v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fulton v. SoopersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Snyder Oil Co. v. EmbreeColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Fulton v. SoopersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Fulton v. SoopersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API