Fulton v. Soopers
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Lohr
I concur in part IIA of the majority opinion. I dissent to part IIB, however, because I am persuaded that the administrative law judge and the appellate tribunals that have reviewed this case have misconstrued the standard established by section 8-42-110(3), 3B C.R.S. (1990 Supp.), to determine whether an employer is entitled to limit an award of permanent partial disability benefits by reemploying an injured employee. I would remand the case for application of what I believe to be the correct standard.
Section 8-42-110(3) creates an incentive for employers to retain or reemploy persons who…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fulton v. King SoopersColorado Court of Appeals · 1990