Fulton v. Soopers
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
Petitioner Kenneth R. Fulton was injured while employed by respondent King Soop-ers, and he subsequently filed a claim for workers’ compensation. King Soopers admitted responsibility. Fulton requested a hearing before the Department of Labor and Employment, Division of Labor, to present evidence of his permanent disfigurement and partial disability. The Administrative Law Judge (AU) limited Fulton’s permanent partial disability award to his permanent medical impairment and disfigurement under the limitation set forth in section 8-42-110(3), 3B C.R.S. (1990 Supp.) (repealed 1991) (formerly §…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Boice v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Valley Tree Service v. JimenezColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Fulton v. King SoopersColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by12 opinions
- Snyder Oil Co. v. EmbreeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Pinnacol Assurance v. HoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. v. ApostolouSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Monfort, Inc. v. GonzalezColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Snyder Oil Co. v. EmbreeColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.