Legal Opinion
Fulton v. Soopers
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 13, 1992No. 91SC76Published
1Opinion of the Court
823 P.2d 709 (1992)
Kenneth R. FULTON, Petitioner,
v.
King SOOPERS, Industrial Claim Appeals Office and Director, Division of Labor, Respondents.
No. 91SC76.
Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
January 13, 1992.
Law Offices of Bruce P. Fierst, P.C., Bruce P. Fierst, Rodney G. Loomis, Denver, for petitioner.
Glasman, Jaynes & McBride, Patricia Jean Clisham, Lydia W. Daugherty, Denver, for respondent King Soopers.
Gale A. Norton, Atty. Gen., Raymond T. Slaughter, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Timothy M. Tymkovich, Sol. Gen., Jeanne Labuda, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for respondents Industrial Claim Appeals…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boice v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Fulton v. SoopersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Valley Tree Service v. JimenezColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Fulton v. King SoopersColorado Court of Appeals · 1990