Legal Opinion

Julia Vasquez v. Saxon Mortgage Inc

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 2011No. CV-11-0091-CQPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HURWITZ, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 Pursuant to AR.S. §§ 12-1861 to -1867 (2003) and Supreme Court Rule 27, we accepted jurisdiction of two questions certified by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona:

1. Is the recording of an assignment of deed of trust required prior to the filing of a notice of trustee’s sale under A.R.S. § 33-808 when the assignee holds a promissory note payable to bearer?

2. Must the beneficiary of a deed of trust being foreclosed pursuant to AR.S. § 33-807 have the right to enforce the secured obligation?

¶ 2 The Bankruptcy Court’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re KrohnArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Newman v. Fidelity Savings & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Buerger Brothers Supply Co. v. El Rey Furniture Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Eardley v. GreenbergArizona Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Steinberger v. McVeyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. Hogan v. Washington Mutual Bank, N.A.Arizona Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Bt Capital v. Td Service Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Edward Zadrozny v. Bank of New York MellonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Nordeen v. Bank of America, N.A. (In Re Nordeen)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API