Legal Opinion
Richmond Heights Village v. Board of County Commissioners
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 1960No. 25026PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By FESS, J.
Appeal on questions of law and fact taken by the plaintiff from a judgment of 'the Court of Common Pleas granting a portion of the in-junctive relief sought by plaintiff against the defendants-appellees.
■ Upon this appeal on law and fact we find the following salient facts extracted from the opinion of the trial court dated April 15, 1959, as follows:
The plaintiff Village of Richmond Heights (herein called the Village) brings its action to enjoin the defendant Board of County Commissioners (herein called the Commissioners) from proceeding further in an action filed January…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Imperial Irrigation Co. v. JayneTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Matter of Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp. v. DunnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- Denver Power & Irrigation Co. v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rite Aid of Ohio, Inc. v. Marc's Variety Store, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Brakefire, Inc. v. OverbeckClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 2007
- Connor Group v. RaneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Superior Savings Ass'n v. Cleveland Council of Unemployed WorkersOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- City of New Haven v. Town of East HavenConnecticut Superior Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.