Legal Opinion

State v. Edwards

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 19, 1893PublishedCited by 26 opinions

On exceptions. This was a complaint under the statutes charging two offenses ; first, for refusing to receive the complainant’s grain to be ground, and, second, for taking excessive tolls for grain received and ground by the defendants.

Read the full summary

On exceptions. This was a complaint under the statutes charging two offenses ; first, for refusing to receive the complainant’s grain to be ground, and, second, for taking excessive tolls for grain received and ground by the defendants. The case was heard by a trial justice and was brought on appeal by the defendants into the Superior Court, for Aroostook County, where the defendants offered to prove that, on tendering the grain mentioned in the first charge, they refused to grind it uinless the complainant would pay a toll in excess of one ■sixteenth part, whereupon he took the grain away to…

1Opinion of the CourtHaskell, J.

The defendants were convicted under R. S., c. 57, § § 5 and 6, as amended by the Act of 1885, c. 332, on two several counts; first, of refusing to receive grain at their gristmill there tendered to be ground ; second, of taking excessive toll. The defendants have exception to the ruling of the court that they were bound to receive the grists of grain offered, and grind th'e same for the toll specified by the statute, and that an agreement for toll in excess of that fixed by statute would be no defense.

The case does not show what kind of a mill the defendants operated, nor whether it was a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Stone v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Budd v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Lowell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. State v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Ratcliff v. Wichita Union Stock-yards Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API