Legal Opinion
Clincher v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 19, 1974No. 25-73PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, Judge
Plaintiffs are seven American Indians who are, or have been, United States employees on Indian reservations. Invoking McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Comm., 411 U.S. 164 (1973), they bring this suit to recover amounts withheld from their wages by the United States for state income taxes and paid over to either the State of Montana or the State of Arizona. They did not protest the withholdings, which ceased after McClanahan, and they have not requested refunds under state practice. Pursuit to Rule 41, Montana and Arizona have been added to the suit as third party defendants. The United States…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Quinault Allottee Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Ray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Central Nat. Bank of Richmond, Va. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Romero v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Bickford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Crone v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Buchan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.