Legal Opinion

Central Nat. Bank of Richmond, Va. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 3, 1950No. 48217PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, Judge.

Plaintiff is a national banking association doing business under the National Banking Act, 12 U.S.C.A. § 21 et seq., with its place of business in Richmond, Virginia.

On October 8, 1945, T. H. Kent of Richmond, Virginia, doing business as Kent and Company, entered into a contract with the defendant to repair certain roads at the Chamberlain Village housing development, U. S. Marine Barracks, Quantico, Virginia, for the sum of $22,600. The contracting officer of the defendant was the Chief of the Bureau of Yards and Docks, Navy Department.

On December 12, 1945, Kent borrowed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Standard Rice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. BorcherlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Central National Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. D & H Distributing Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. Produce Factors Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  3. Clincher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  4. Waxman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  5. American Financial Associates, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API