Legal Opinion

Honchariw v. County of Stanislaus

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 2011No. F060788PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, J.

INTRODUCTION

Government Code section 65589.51 is known as the Housing Accountability Act (see § 65589.5, subd. (o)), and has been referred to colloquially as the “ ‘Anti NIMBY’ law.”2 (Schellinger Brothers v. City of Sebastopol (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 1245, 1253, fn. 9 [102 Cal.Rptr.3d 394].) The purpose of the *1069statute is to limit the ability of local governments to “reject or make infeasible housing developments . . . without a thorough analysis of the economic, social, and environmental effects of the action . . . .” (§ 65589.5, subd. (b).) Subdivision (j) of the statute…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. North Pacifica LLC v. City of PacificaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Poet v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. People v. Accredited Surety Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. 6354 Figarden General PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Honchariw v. County of StanislausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Rea v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API