Legal Opinion
Smith v. Campbell
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided November 19, 1991No. 1:88-0456PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOHN T. NIXON, Chief Judge.
This case involves a habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner’s primary claim is that his guilty plea, entered near the conclusion of a jury trial in this matter, was involuntary and unintelligent insofar as his counsel’s constitutionally deficient representation required him to enter the plea. The Court has received the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation in this matter, to which objections have been filed. 1 The Magistrate concluded that petitioner’s arguments have no merit and therefore recommended that the petition be…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Momon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- David Neuman v. Jessie RiversCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Vernard Miles, Jr. v. Donald A. Dorsey, Warden Attorney General of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. MartinsmithCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- Momon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.