Legal Opinion

Momon v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

18 S.W.3d 152 (1999)

Napoleon MOMON, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Tennessee, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Knoxville.

November 15, 1999.

Opinion Granting Rehearing March 30, 2000.

Stephen M. Goldstein, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for Appellant.

Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter, Michael E. Moore, Solicitor General, Daryl J. Brand, Associate Solicitor General, William H. Cox, III, District Attorney General 11th Judicial District, Rodney C. Strong. Assistant District Attorney, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for Appellee.

OPINION

FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, Justice.

The appellant, Napoleon Momon, requested…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Per curiam.

2Cases cited124 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API