Dean v. Dean
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Defendant contends that the court erred in finding and concluding that her failure to take Jason to church and Sunday School was jeopardizing his spiritual values. This contention is without merit.
Defendant argues that this finding is not supported by evidence and that the court’s consideration of church attendance is forbidden by the United States and North Carolina Constitutions. We disagree.
We think the finding that defendant had not taken Jason to church or Sunday School on a regular basis is adequately supported by competent evidence. Defendant detailed her weekends with her…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blackley v. BlackleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Swicegood v. SwicegoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- In Re McCraw ChildrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Paschall v. PaschallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- In Re MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Morris v. MorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Phelps v. PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Provencal v. ProvencalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Wolgin v. WolginCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Kelly v. KellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985