Legal Opinion

Pendergraft v. Pendergraft

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 16, 1974No. 7421DC707PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALEY, Judge.

The evidence presented at the hearing in the trial court is not brought forward in the record and will be presumed to be sufficient to support the findings of fact. Carter v. Carter, 232 N.C. 614, 61 S.E. 2d 711; Christie v. Powell, 15 N.C. App. 508, 190 S.E. 2d 367, cert. denied, 281 N.C. 756, 191 S.E. 2d 361. But defendant contends that the findings of fact are not sufficient to support the order of the court awarding custody of the children to the plaintiff, granting support for the children, and directing the payment of attorney fees.

“It is not necessary for the trial judge…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Swicegood v. SwicegoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Coggins v. CogginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Christie v. PowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Forbes v. ForbesWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. BrandonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. In re Custody of EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API