Legal Opinion

Plascencia v. Deese

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 2021No. B299142Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 1/20/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX RODOLFO PLASCENCIA et al., 2d Crim. No. B299142 (Consolidated with No. Plaintiffs and Respondents, B299925) (Super. Ct. No. 56-2015- v. 00475756- CU-PO-VTA) CHARLES GYNN DEESE et al., (Ventura County) Defendants and Appellants. One of the institutional functions of the California Court of Appeal is to opine on whether or not an error at trial has resulted in a miscarriage of justice. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 13.)1 Here, there has been a miscarriage of justice and we…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Love v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. City of Los Angeles v. DeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API