Legal Opinion
Feldhake v. City of Santa Fe
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 22, 1956No. 6038PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIKER, Justice.
The suit of plaintiffs sought to set aside a determination of the City of Santa Fe to pave certain streets in Paving District 8, plaintiffs being abutting landowners liable to assessment therefor. Plaintiffs prayed, in the alternative, that if the City should proceed, or threaten to proceed, with the paving in District 8, the court enjoin the City from so doing.
Plaintiffs’ complaint was based upon alleged irregularities in the proceedings of the City and its engineers which led up to the order for paving the District.
The City followed what is known as the “provisional order”…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Warren v. HenlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Oliver v. Bd. of Trsts. of Town of AlamogordoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
- Fort Howard Paper Co. v. Fox River Heights Sanitary DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- City of Excelsior Springs v. EttensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Palmer v. WaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1881
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rowley v. MurrayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Bowdich v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Kissane v. City of AnchorageDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1958
- Cahn v. BerrymanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
- Shalit v. City Commission of City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.