Kissane v. City of Anchorage
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
HODGE, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action for a declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and Rule 57, Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C.A., seeking to declare invalid Ordinance No. 1278 of the City of Anchorage and Chap. 17, S.L.A.1955, as amended by Chap. 171, S.L.A.1957, relating to the establishment of off-street parking facilities; and to enjoin the defendant City and its officers from further proceedings or expenditures under said Ordinance.
The facts in the case are not in dispute, and are principally covered by pre-trial order, as follows: plaintiff Kissane, a taxpayer of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- HENDERSON BRIDGE COMPANY v. Henderson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Branson v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Larsen v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- City of Whittier v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Alexander v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wing v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Hanrahan v. AltermanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Miller v. Matanuska-Susitna BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Property Owners Ass'n of the Highland Subdivision a Portion of USMS 769 v. City of KetchikanAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Fairbanks North Star Borough v. College Utilities Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.