Legal Opinion

Shalit v. City Commission of City of Albuquerque

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1956No. 6065PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUJAN, Justice.

On March 1, 1955, the City Commission of the City of Albuquerque, New Mexico, by resolution, directed the engineering firm of Herkenhoff and Turney to prepare an assessment plat and estimate cost for the creation of paving district No. 91. On April 19, 1955, the City Commission by resolution No. 2 set up the paving district which extends north to Aspen Avenue, south to Kathyrn Avenue, east to Wyoming Boulevard and west to Yale Boulevard. Thereafter the city commission by provisional order required the paving of certain streets within said district, including Kathyrn Avenue, in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Larsen v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Federal Construction Co. v. EnsignCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Mount Saint Mary's Cemetery Assn. v. MullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Oliver v. Bd. of Trsts. of Town of AlamogordoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Albuquerque v. ChapmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Rowley v. MurrayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Teutsch v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Fowler v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Hedges v. City Commission of City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API