Legal Opinion

Law Office of Brattain v. Anderson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1995No. S-6264PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Appellants (the lawyers) are the holders of a promissory note executed by Gerald Evans two years before his death. The lawyers filed a petition for payment against the Evans estate. The superior court held their claim time-barred under AS 13.16.475(a), and entered summary judgment in favor of the estate. We reverse.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In 1981 Gerald Evans signed a promissory note in favor of the lawyers. The note represented Evans’ share of the expense of legal work that the lawyers had performed on behalf of a partnership. Evans died, allegedly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hernandez-Robaina v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Lowery v. HairstonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Morkunas v. Anchorage Telephone UtilityAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Hawkes Hospital v. ColleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Ramsey v. City of Sand PointAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Holland v. Union Oil Co. of California, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. McConkey v. HartAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Mahan v. Arctic Catering, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API