Legal Opinion

Saks v. B. H. Stinemetz & Son Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 3, 1923No. 3942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

This is a writ of error to the municipal court of the District of Columbia and involves a decision of that court dismissing plaintiff in error’s complaint, instituted to recover possession of premises leased by him to the defendant in error. The parties will be referred to here as plaintiff and defendant.

According to the averments of the original complaint, filed September 2, 1922, plaintiff leased to the defendant for a term of years premises known as Nos. 1201, 1201%, and 1203 F Street Northwest, in the city of Washington, at an annual rental of $18,000 payable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. De Witt & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Sheets v. SeldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Kann v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Moline Plow Co. v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Gordon v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Trans-Lux Radio City Corp. v. Service Parking Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. W. F. M. Restaurant, Inc. v. AusternNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Escher v. Harrison Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  4. W. F. M. Restaurant, Inc. v. AusternNew York Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API