Legal Opinion

W. F. M. Restaurant, Inc. v. Austern

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1973Published

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel G-. Albert, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action for judgment declaring that the lease between plaintiff and defendants remains in force and effect despite the filing of an involuntary petition in bankruptcy against plaintiff which, according to the literal terms of the lease, had the effect of authorizing the defendant landlords to terminate such lease. Both-parties seek summary judgment, and it is hence conceded that there is no triable issue of fact to bar the granting of summary relief.

On November 4, 1970 plaintiff was assigned the subject lease by the prior tenant; in December, 1972 no rent was paid; on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stewart v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Mann v. . Munch BreweryNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Noyes v. . AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. In re Scholtz-Mutual Drug Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1924
  5. Saks v. B. H. Stinemetz & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API