Legal Opinion

Moline Plow Co. v. Webb

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 23, 1891No. 1227PublishedCited by 35 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. The court stated the case as follows: This action was brought October 31, 1889, to recover the amount due on three promissory notes, each for the sum of two thousand dollars, executed January 21, 1882, by John A. Webb and J. W. Webb, composing the firm of John A. Webb & Bro., and payable, with interest from date at eight per .cent per annum, to S. W. Wheelock or order on the first days,…

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. The court stated the case as follows: This action was brought October 31, 1889, to recover the amount due on three promissory notes, each for the sum of two thousand dollars, executed January 21, 1882, by John A. Webb and J. W. Webb, composing the firm of John A. Webb & Bro., and payable, with interest from date at eight per .cent per annum, to S. W. Wheelock or order on the first days, respectively, of November, 1885, 1886 and 1887. The original petition alleged that the notes prior to their maturity were…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Haelan

Although the record' recites that the case was heard upon the pleadings and evidence, it does not appear that any oral testimony was introduced.' No bill of exceptions was signed, and the finding by the court was general, stating only its conclusions of law. The defendant, therefore, contends that there is nothing before this court for review. .. This position cannot be sustained. The notes, upon which the action is based, and the deed of trust filed with and made a part of the supplemental petition — their execution not having been denied by the defendants under oath — are to be taken,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Fievel v. ZuberTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Bennett v. ButterworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  4. Goldfrank, Frank & Co. v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Young v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Madden v. Lancaster CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  2. City Nat. Bank of Corpus Christi v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Wentland v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  4. Mason v. LuceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Baca v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API