Legal Opinion

City of Fresno v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 1, 2021No. 16-1276Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims ) CITY OF FRESNO, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 16-1276C ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) (Filed: February 1, 2021) ) Defendant, ) ) ) and ) ) SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER ) AUTHORITY, et al., and CENTRAL ) CALIFORNIA IRRIGATION DISTRICT, et al. ) ) Defendant-Intervenors. ) ) OPINION AND ORDER KAPLAN, Judge. Plaintiffs in this action include the City of Fresno, California, and seventeen irrigation districts in California that have entered contracts with the Bureau of Reclamation to receive water supplied by the Friant Division of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sandra K. Rucker, Herbert Rucker, Cheryl Dunham, Etc., and James Dunham v. Wabash Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  2. Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Roberts v. HeimDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1989
  4. Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg SchoolsDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1998
  5. Zito v. Leasecomm Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API