Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Heim

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 17, 1989No. C 84-8069 TEHPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.

The foregoing recommendations of the Special Master are adopted in their entirety and shall become an Order of this Court.

RECOMMENDATION OF SPECIAL MASTER AND ORDER THEREON

(Re Defendants’ Contention Interrogatories to Plaintiffs)

I INTRODUCTION

GERALD A. COHN, Special Master.

Defendants, FOX & COMPANY, FRIEDMAN & SHAFTAN, BASKIN & STEIN-GUT, and the WICHITA PARTNERSHIPS, move the Court to compel Plaintiffs to provide them with further responses to three sub-interrogatories contained in Defendants’ Joint Second Set Of Interrogatories. A previous motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marine Petroleum Company v. Champlin Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority v. Clow Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1985

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Lucero v. ValdezDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
  2. Shriners Hospitals for Crippled Children, Inc. v. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Alameda County Employees' Retirement Association v. BP PLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
  4. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System v. BP PLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
  5. Avalon Holdings, Inc. v. BP, PLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API