Legal Opinion

Sandra K. Rucker, Herbert Rucker, Cheryl Dunham, Etc., and James Dunham v. Wabash Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 3, 1969No. 17392PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this diversity action for personal injuries resulting from a train-automobile collision on the Constant Street railroad crossing of defendant Wabash Railroad Company at Dawson, Illinois. Four of the counts of the Amended Complaint claimed a statutory violation and a wilful statutory violation. The remaining counts were for negligence and wilful and wanton misconduct. At the close of the evidence, the court directed a verdict for the defendant on the statutory counts, and the jury returned a verdict for the defendant on the common law counts.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Gooch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. United States v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
  2. Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  3. Eldon C. Hart v. John L. McLucas Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, and National Transportation Safety BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. Trustees of Indiana University v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  5. Allstate New Jersey Ins. Co. v. Gregorio Lajara (073511)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API