Legal Opinion

Roth v. National Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 5, 1934No. 31,575Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action on a fire insurance policy. The defense was that at the time of the loss liability of defendant under the policy was suspended because of the nonpayment in full of a note given for a part of the premium. A jury was waived. Many of the facts were agreed upon. Judgment was for plaintiff, and defendant has appealed. We refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court.

Defendant is a fire insurance company, having a western department at Chicago, an agent for this state at Topeka, and an agent, Harry Mellor, at…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Washburn v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  2. Palmer v. . Phoenix Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. v. School Dist. No. 62 of Jackson CountsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Adam v. Columbian National Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920
  5. Eikelberger v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API