Legal Opinion
Ezold v. Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 28, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 90-0002PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JAMES McGIRR KELLY, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Nancy O’Mar a Ezold’s Motion for Review of the Clerk’s Taxation of Costs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d).
A. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On November 29,1990, after a bench trial, this Court found that the defendant law firm of Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen (“Wolf, Block”) had violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq, (“Title VII”) by deny*15ing Ezold partnership on the basis of her sex. Judgment was entered in favor of Ezold on July 23,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Nancy O'Mara Ezold, at No. 91-1780 v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, at No. 91-1741Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Danny Clark CROSS, Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- White & White, Inc., Bluefield Supply Co., Crocker-Fels Co., and Ransdell Surgical, Inc. v. American Hospital Supply Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alphonso Singleton v. Lee Edward Smith and Eric RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Greene v. Fraternal Order of PoliceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Coulter v. Newmont Gold Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1994
- Krouse v. American Sterilizer Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- City of Rome v. GlantonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.