Legal Opinion
Krouse v. American Sterilizer Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 6, 1996No. Civil Action 93-313 EriePublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This was an action under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. The Plaintiff, Robert Krouse, alleged that his employer, the Defendant, American Sterilizer Company (“AMSCO”), improperly failed to accommodate him on the basis of a disability and improperly changed his work assignment. See Krouse v. American Sterilizer Co., 872. F.Supp. 203, 204 (W.D.Pa. 1994). On August 8, 1995, this Court dismissed this action because of the failure of Krouse and his counsel to prosecute it. 1 AMSCO then asked that the Clerk of this Court tax costs…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Alvaro Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc. And Playskool Baby, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Krouse v. American Sterilizer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Race Tires America, Inc. v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Krouse v. American Sterilizer Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Baker v. Power Securities Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- Greene v. Fraternal Order of PoliceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.