Legal Opinion
City of Rome v. Glanton
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 3, 1999No. Civ.A. 96-5284PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
KATZ, Senior District Judge.
The battle over whether Richard Glanton, on behalf of the Barnes Foundation, made a contract to exhibit art works is over. The battle over whether Rome’s officials slandered Mr. Glanton by calling him a “conman” is over. Yet the dogs of war still fight over the bones, i.e., the bills of costs. Enough is enough. Each side shall bear its own costs.
Background
As the facts of this case have been set out at length previously, it suffices to provide only an abbreviated version of the case history. The City of Rome and other plaintiffs filed a complaint…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Scientific Holding Company, Ltd. v. Plessey IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Robert P. Kropp v. Sylvester A. Ziebarth, A/K/A Silver A. Ziebarth, and Carol A. Ziebarth, Husband and Wife, and Cleon StriegelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- City of Rome v. GlantonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Srybnik v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adams v. Teamsters Local 115District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- B. Braun Medical, Inc. v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Tao of Systems Integration, Inc. v. Analytical Services & Materials, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Wheatley v. Moe's Southwest Grill, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
- EWING v. HILLSTONE RESTAURANT GROUPDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023