Legal Opinion
Nancy O'Mara Ezold, at No. 91-1780 v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, at No. 91-1741
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 3, 1993No. 19-1067PublishedCited by 570 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.
Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen (Wolf) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granting relief in favor of Nancy O’Mara Ezold (Ezold) on her claim that Wolf intentionally discriminated against her on the basis of her sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1981 & Supp. 1992), when it decided not to admit her to the firm’s partnership effective February 1, 1989. At trial Wolf contended that it denied Ezold…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by570 opinions
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Edward E. ERCEGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Krouse v. American Sterilizer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Mary Burton v. Teleflex IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Barbara R. Sheridan v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Jacques AmblardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
565 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.