Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. Lifeguard, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLEY, J.
This case is a dispute between two health care service plans over which must pay for emergency medical services rendered to a patient who was covered under both plans. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., paid for the services and sued Lifeguard, Inc., for reimbursement. The trial court found that Kaiser was responsible for all of the costs in question and entered judgment for Lifeguard, from which Kaiser appeals. We conclude that each side is responsible for one-half of the costs and therefore reverse.
I
The case was tried to the court on stipulated facts. Michael Bozzo…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Viking Pools, Inc. v. MaloneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Noroian v. Department of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Molenda v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- DeCastro West Chodorow & Burns, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- In Re ChavezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Abrahim & Sons Enterprises v. Equilon Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority v. ReaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.