Zeltiq Aesthetics, Inc. v. BTL Industries, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Zeltiq Aesthetics, Inc. (“Zeltiq”) filed this action against Defendants BTL Industries, Inc. . and Saturn Consulting LLC dba Monarch Laser Services (“Defendants”). Zeltiq alleges that Defendants falsely advertised that a medical device manufactured by BTL was approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) to be used for fat reduction and body contouring. Zeltiq asserts claims under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125, and claims for unfair competition under…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Castrol Inc. v. Pennzoil Company and Pennzoil Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ingrid & Isabel, LLC v. Baby Be Mine, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014