In Re Stoll
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner in rejecting claims 9, 10, 11, and 12 in appellants’ application for a patent for certain alleged “new and useful improvements in Sympatheticolytically Active Dihydro-Derivatives of Lysergic Acid Amides and their Manufacture.” No claims were allowed.
Claims 9 and 10 were rejected as un-patentable over the prior art of record and claims 11 and 12 were rejected as being drawn to nonelected species and, therefore, need not be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Von BramerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- In Re MardenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- In re FinkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
3Cited by14 opinions
- Application of Edward Burton LegriceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Herbert C. Murray and Durey H. PetersonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- In re SchlittlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Application of ShackellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Application of StrainCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.