Legal Opinion
Application of Kebrich
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 6, 1953No. 5922PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Primary Examiner rejecting the four product claims in appellant’s application for patent reading:
“12. A new chemical compound corresponding to the general formula 2PbO.Pb(CnH2n 1 COO)2 where ‘n’ represents a number of carbon atoms at least 5 and up to 29.
“13. A new chemical compound, dibasic lead stearate, corresponding to the formula 2PbO.Pb(CrrH35COO)2.”
(Tt is our understanding that the formula in claim 13 has the same meaning to those skilled in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Von BramerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- Application of WilliamsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- In Re CrosleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- In Re MardenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
3Cited by21 opinions
- J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- J.P. Stevens & Co. v. Lex Tex Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Application of Charles D. Prater and James WeiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of Edward Burton LegriceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.