Legal Opinion

Bingle v. Liggett Drug Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 25, 1951No. Civ. No. 50-886PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD, District Judge.

Plaintiff here moves that defendant be ordered to comply with an order of this court dated April 23, 1951 directing defendant to permit the inspection and copying of designated documents in possession and .control of the defendant. Defendant has refused to produce certain of the statements listed in the previous order on the ground that they are not in the possession or control of' defendant..

The action is one for personal injuries allegedly received by plaintiff when she fell in defendant’s store. The attorney representing defendant is the attorney of the insurance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Price v. LevittDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1939
  2. Poppino v. Jones Store Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1940
  3. Martin v. N. V. Nederlandsche Amerikaansche Stoomvaart MaatchappijDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  4. Bough v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  2. Kozlowski v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1976
  3. Henderson v. Zurn Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1990
  4. Hawes Firearms Co. v. EdwardsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State Farm Insurance Company v. RobertsArizona Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API